Back to Blog
Test mac pro battery life6/16/2023 ![]() ![]() But to make sure all the machines are comparable, Consumer Reports also disables some of the features on them, which includes caching of website data.Īpple identified this as one of the problems, since the figures that the company provides are taken into account caching of webpages, which is the default behavior in Safari and Consumer Reports did deviate from the default behavior, not just for Safari but for users in general, in order to run their tests. The goal here is to mimic the real world usage and opening and closing websites is a pretty reliable way to do it. They open a set of locally stored websites on the default browser, set the display to 100 nits brightness, and let the battery run dry as the computer cycles through the websites. The first one is not much of an issue but rather the way Consumer Reports runs battery life tests on its computers. ![]() According to Apple's statement, the reason is two-fold, with the first being the way the notebooks were tested and the other being a bug in Safari. Since then, Apple has been working with Consumer Reports to figure out what could be the source of this discrepancy and inconsistency with its own results. But perhaps more perplexing was the incredible inconsistency in the results, with battery life varying from 3.75 hours to 19.5 hours. ![]() Last month, Consumer Reports released their report for the new 2016 MacBook Pro testing, which featured rather disappointing battery life results.
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |